Meraki, a leader in cloud-managed IT solutions, offers flexible licensing models to accommodate various network needs. Among these, Meraki Per-Device Licensing and Meraki Co-Termination Licensing are the two primary options. Each licensing model has distinct features, benefits, and drawbacks, making it essential to understand their differences to choose the best fit for your organization.
This article provides a detailed comparison of Meraki Per-Device Licensing and Meraki Co-Termination Licensing. We will explore key features, activation processes, expiration dates, advantages, and disadvantages of each licensing model. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which licensing option suits your network requirements and organizational goals.
Meraki Per-Device Licensing is a flexible licensing model where each device in the network requires an individual license. This means that each Meraki device, whether it’s a security appliance, switch, or wireless access point, operates under a separate license. The primary benefit of this model is the ability to manage and renew licenses on a per-device basis, offering ultimate flexibility.
In the Per-Device Licensing model, each device’s license can be activated separately, allowing for staggered license start dates. This model provides precise control over network assets and helps organizations manage their budget more effectively. However, keeping track of individual licenses can be challenging, especially for large networks.
Activating licenses under the Per-Device Licensing model is straightforward. Each device is assigned a unique license key that must be entered into the Meraki dashboard. This process ensures that the device is properly licensed and can function within the network. Activation can be done at any time, providing flexibility in managing network resources.
Once activated, each device operates under its license until its expiration date. This individual activation process allows for seamless integration of new devices into the network without disrupting existing operations.
In the Per-Device Licensing model, each device’s license has its own expiration date. This means that licenses need to be renewed individually, according to their specific timelines. This can be advantageous for budgeting purposes, as it allows organizations to spread out licensing costs over time.
However, managing multiple expiration dates can be complex, particularly for large networks with numerous devices. It’s crucial to keep track of each license’s expiration to avoid lapses in coverage, which could lead to device shutdowns or network access issues.
One of the main advantages of Per-Device Licensing is its flexibility. Organizations can purchase and renew licenses based on their specific needs, allowing for a customized approach to network management. This is particularly useful for organizations with diverse hardware models and device types, as each device can be managed individually.
Additionally, the Per-Device Licensing model can help with budgeting, as licenses can be renewed separately. This allows organizations to allocate funds over time rather than facing a large, single renewal cost.
Despite its flexibility, the Per-Device Licensing model can be challenging to manage, especially for large networks. Keeping track of multiple license expiration dates and ensuring timely renewals requires careful oversight. Failing to renew a license can lead to individual device shutdowns, which can disrupt network operations.
Another drawback is the potential for increased https://www.stratusinfosystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/123-2-2.jpgistrative overhead. Managing a large number of individual licenses can be time-consuming and requires diligent record-keeping to avoid lapses in coverage.
Meraki Co-Termination Licensing offers a simplified approach to network licensing by synchronizing the expiration dates of all licenses within an organization. Under this model, all licenses co-terminate on the same date, making it easier to manage renewals and maintain proper licensing across the entire network.
This licensing model uses a weighted average to calculate the co-term date, based on the expiration dates of all active licenses. This centralized management approach simplifies license tracking and ensures that all devices remain licensed and operational, reducing the risk of individual device shutdowns due to expired licenses.
Activating licenses under the Co-Termination Licensing model involves entering the license key into the Meraki dashboard, similar to the Per-Device model. However, instead of individual expiration dates, the new license’s term is factored into the organization’s co-term date. This process ensures that all licenses within the network are synchronized and co-terminate on the same date.
This unified activation process simplifies license management and ensures that all devices are properly licensed and operational. The centralized approach reduces the https://www.stratusinfosystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/123-2-2.jpgistrative burden associated with tracking multiple expiration dates.
In the Co-Termination Licensing model, all licenses within an organization share a single expiration date. This unified expiration date is determined by calculating the weighted average of all active licenses. This approach simplifies the renewal process, as all licenses can be renewed simultaneously.
While the single expiration date reduces https://www.stratusinfosystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/123-2-2.jpgistrative complexity, it also means that the entire network must be re-licensed at once. This can result in a larger, single renewal cost, which may require careful budgeting and planning.
One of the primary advantages of Co-Termination Licensing is the simplified management of licenses. With a single expiration date for all licenses, organizations can streamline their renewal processes and ensure that all devices remain properly licensed. This reduces the risk of individual device shutdowns due to expired licenses.
The centralized approach also makes it easier to manage large networks, as all licenses are synchronized and tracked together. This can lead to more efficient oversight and coordination of network resources.
Despite its simplicity, the Co-Termination Licensing model has some drawbacks. One of the main disadvantages is the potential for a large, single renewal cost. Since all licenses co-terminate on the same date, organizations must budget for a significant expenditure at the time of renewal.
Additionally, the Co-Termination model may lack the flexibility of the Per-Device Licensing model. Organizations with diverse hardware models and device types may find it challenging to accommodate their unique needs within a single, unified licensing term.
The primary differences between Per-Device Licensing and Co-Termination Licensing lie in their management complexity and renewal processes. Per-Device Licensing offers greater flexibility by allowing individual license renewals, while Co-Termination Licensing simplifies management with a single expiration date for all licenses.
Cost implications also differ between the two models. Per-Device Licensing spreads out costs over time, whereas Co-Termination Licensing requires a larger, single renewal cost. Scalability and flexibility are key considerations when choosing between these licensing options, as each model offers distinct benefits depending on the organization’s size and network requirements.
Choosing the right licensing model depends on several factors, including the size of your network, budget constraints, and management preferences. Organizations with smaller networks or those looking for maximum flexibility may prefer the Per-Device Licensing model. This allows for tailored license management and staggered renewals.
On the other hand, larger organizations or those seeking simplified license management may benefit from the Co-Termination Licensing model. This model offers centralized oversight and reduces https://www.stratusinfosystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/123-2-2.jpgistrative complexity, making it easier to maintain proper licensing across the entire network.
Understanding the differences between Meraki Per-Device Licensing and Co-Termination Licensing is crucial for effective network management. Each model offers unique benefits and challenges, making it essential to evaluate your organization’s specific needs and goals. By carefully considering factors such as network size, budget, and management preferences, you can choose the licensing model that best fits your requirements.
Ultimately, both licensing models aim to ensure that your network remains secure, operational, and compliant with Meraki’s standards. Whether you opt for the flexibility of Per-Device Licensing or the simplicity of Co-Termination Licensing, proper license management is key to maintaining a robust and efficient network.
The Meraki license grace period is a 30-day period after the expiration of a license during which the device remains operational. This grace period allows organizations to renew their licenses without experiencing any service disruptions.
Yes, it is possible to switch from Per-Device to Co-Termination Licensing. Contact Meraki support for assistance with the transition, as they will help synchronize your licenses to a single expiration date.
The co-term date is calculated using a weighted average of all active licenses’ expiration dates. This ensures that all licenses within the organization share a single expiration date.
Managing licenses for multiple devices can be done through the Meraki dashboard. The dashboard provides tools to track license status, expiration dates, and renewal needs for all devices in the network.
Stay informed about our newest releases and updates
